project:legal:productliability

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
project:legal:productliability [2013/08/15 22:36] lolegproject:legal:productliability [2018/11/13 15:34] (current) – [Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD)] alicesmith
Line 1: Line 1:
-===== Strict Product Liability =====+This is a [[event:2013-09|LegalHack@OKCon 2013]] challenge
  
-This is a [[event:2013-09|LegalHack@OKCon 2013]] challenge from SwissRe.+====== Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD) ======
  
-Visualize applicable legal theories/rules by venue about Strict Product Liability (country, state or province)+This project aims to build a Linked Data repository containing information about regimes in product liability.
  
-Goals: +=== Hackathon goals ===
  
-  * Identify what can be the basis for strict product liability claim (e.g. type of product)For example: products sold to consumers without further processing can be the basis for a claim in Germany but not in North Carolina, where contributory negligence applies.+It is proof of conceptWe would like to investigate and define a systematic approach to collect the data, if possible in an automatic way
  
-Reference links and data sources:+=== Some possible practical steps ===
  
-  * TBD+  - An existing standard legal ontology has to be found 
 +  - The ontology is then extended with the needed concepts in order to be able to model the different legal theories used to establish a link between plaintiff and defendant. 
 +  - (optional): a vizualisation could be done to offer a didactic overview of what product liability is  
 +  - A [[http://dydra.com/alogean/lpld|triple store]] is set.  
 +  - Starting from the defined ontology, the triple store is then populated with  information about different applicable legal product liability theories. This is done by venue (country, state or province) and other criteria (e.g. type of product) and could look like this: 
  
-====== Project =====+^ Jurisdiction   ^ Subcontext ^ Valid as of ^ Strict applicable ^ Type of negligence  ^ Comment ^ 
 +| Germany        | -          | -           | yes  | ?                               | 
 +| Germany        | chemical   | -           | no   | ?                               | 
 +| Germany        | Food        2010       | yes  | ?                               | 
 +| North Carolina | -          |             | yes  | contributory negligence |         | 
 +| ...            | ...        | ....        | ...  | ...                     | ...     |
  
-(screenshots or sketches up here)+  - Bonus points: determine anticipated changes to applicable legal theories
  
-Brief description goes here. Add sections below if you need more room.+==== Data sources ====
  
-Include links to your demo and/or source code. +  TBD
- +
-===== Data ===== +
- +
-  List and link your actual and ideal data sources.+
  
-===== Team =====+==== Team ====
  
-  * Add team members+  * [[user:alog|Antoine Logean]]
  
-===== Links =====+==== Links ====
  
-  * Relevant documentation ... +  * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_liability 
-  * Blog or forum posts ... +  * http://lawlibrary.hamline.edu/businesslaw 
-  * Tools you used ...+  * https://www.gov.uk/product-liability-and-safety-law 
 + 
      
 {{tag>status:concept legal needs:dev needs:design needs:data needs:expert}} {{tag>status:concept legal needs:dev needs:design needs:data needs:expert}}
  • project/legal/productliability.1376598991.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2013/08/15 22:36
  • by loleg