Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- project:swiss_open_government_licence [2013/08/15 23:11] – tagged loleg
+++ project:swiss_open_government_licence [2013/09/06 17:15] – loleg
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Swiss Open Government Licence ======
+There is not yet an "Open Government Data Swiss Licence" like the one found in UK, see [[Open Government License|http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/]] (gov.uk) It would be great to get French & German translations of [[http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/|Open Data Commons 1.0]] and an adaptation to Swiss laws. This challenge is being led by the Swiss [[http://www.creativecommons.ch/|Creative Commons working group]].
-There is not yet an "Open Government Data Swiss Licence" like the one found in UK:
+References:
+  * **CC-BY**: Examples from other countries show that a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons|Creative Commons Licence]] with mandatory data source specification could be a good starting point. See [[in English|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]], and [[in French|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.fr]].
+  * **APIE V2**: //L'Agence du patrimoine immatériel de l'Etat// in France has defined the following licence (juin 2011): [[APIE-V2.37|https://www.apiefrance.fr/sections/acces_thematique/reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/des-conditions-generales-pour-la-reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/downloadFile/attachedFile_3/contribution_APIE_licence_libre_et_gratuite_V2_0711_2.pdf?nocache=1311096502.37]]
+  * **ODbL**: Mettre les données sous OdBL reste la meilleure option pour rester compatible avec OSM: [[Open Data Commons ODBL|opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/]]
-[[http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/|http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/]]
+====== Project =====
-==== CC BY ====
+(screenshots or sketches up here)
+Brief description goes here. Add sections below if you need more room.
-Nevertheless examples from other countries show that a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons|Creative Commons Licence]] with mandatory data source specification could be a good starting point:
+Include links to your demo and/or source code.
+===== Data =====
-in English: [[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]]
+  * List and link your actual and ideal data sources.
+===== Team =====
-in French: [[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.fr|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.fr]]
+  * Add your team members
+===== Links =====
-==== APIE V2 ====
+  * Relevant documentation ...
+  * Blog or forum posts ...
+  * Tools you used ...
-"Agence du patrimoine immatériel de l'Etat" in France has defined the following licence (juin 2011):
+{{tag>status:concept legal needs:dev needs:design needs:data needs:expert}}
-[[https://www.apiefrance.fr/sections/acces_thematique/reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/des-conditions-generales-pour-la-reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/downloadFile/attachedFile_3/contribution_APIE_licence_libre_et_gratuite_V2_0711_2.pdf?nocache=1311096502.37|https://www.apiefrance.fr/sections/acces_thematique/reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/des-conditions-generales-pour-la-reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/downloadFile/attachedFile_3/contribution_APIE_licence_libre_et_gratuite_V2_0711_2.pdf?nocache=1311096502.37]]
-==== ODbL ====
-Mettre les données sous OdBL reste la meilleure option pour rester compatible avec OSM
-[[http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/|opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/]]
-{{tag>status:concept legal needs:expert}}