Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision |
project:swiss_open_government_licence [2013/08/15 23:11] – tagged loleg | project:swiss_open_government_licence [2013/09/06 17:15] – loleg |
---|
====== Swiss Open Government Licence ====== | ====== Swiss Open Government Licence ====== |
| |
| There is not yet an "Open Government Data Swiss Licence" like the one found in UK, see [[Open Government License|http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/]] (gov.uk) It would be great to get French & German translations of [[http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/|Open Data Commons 1.0]] and an adaptation to Swiss laws. This challenge is being led by the Swiss [[http://www.creativecommons.ch/|Creative Commons working group]]. |
| |
There is not yet an "Open Government Data Swiss Licence" like the one found in UK: | References: |
| |
| * **CC-BY**: Examples from other countries show that a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons|Creative Commons Licence]] with mandatory data source specification could be a good starting point. See [[in English|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]], and [[in French|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.fr]]. |
| * **APIE V2**: //L'Agence du patrimoine immatériel de l'Etat// in France has defined the following licence (juin 2011): [[APIE-V2.37|https://www.apiefrance.fr/sections/acces_thematique/reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/des-conditions-generales-pour-la-reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/downloadFile/attachedFile_3/contribution_APIE_licence_libre_et_gratuite_V2_0711_2.pdf?nocache=1311096502.37]] |
| * **ODbL**: Mettre les données sous OdBL reste la meilleure option pour rester compatible avec OSM: [[Open Data Commons ODBL|opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/]] |
| |
[[http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/|http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/]] | |
| |
| ====== Project ===== |
| |
==== CC BY ==== | (screenshots or sketches up here) |
| |
| Brief description goes here. Add sections below if you need more room. |
| |
Nevertheless examples from other countries show that a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons|Creative Commons Licence]] with mandatory data source specification could be a good starting point: | Include links to your demo and/or source code. |
| |
| ===== Data ===== |
| |
in English: [[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]] | * List and link your actual and ideal data sources. |
| |
| ===== Team ===== |
| |
in French: [[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.fr|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.fr]] | * Add your team members |
| |
| ===== Links ===== |
| |
==== APIE V2 ==== | * Relevant documentation ... |
| * Blog or forum posts ... |
| * Tools you used ... |
"Agence du patrimoine immatériel de l'Etat" in France has defined the following licence (juin 2011): | |
| {{tag>status:concept legal needs:dev needs:design needs:data needs:expert}} |
| |
[[https://www.apiefrance.fr/sections/acces_thematique/reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/des-conditions-generales-pour-la-reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/downloadFile/attachedFile_3/contribution_APIE_licence_libre_et_gratuite_V2_0711_2.pdf?nocache=1311096502.37|https://www.apiefrance.fr/sections/acces_thematique/reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/des-conditions-generales-pour-la-reutilisation-des-informations-publiques/downloadFile/attachedFile_3/contribution_APIE_licence_libre_et_gratuite_V2_0711_2.pdf?nocache=1311096502.37]] | |
| |
| |
==== ODbL ==== | |
| |
| |
Mettre les données sous OdBL reste la meilleure option pour rester compatible avec OSM | |
| |
| |
[[http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/|opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/]] | |
| |
{{tag>status:concept legal needs:expert}} | |