project:legal:casesuccess

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
project:legal:casesuccess [2013/09/06 17:40] – created lolegproject:legal:casesuccess [2018/11/13 14:47] (current) – [Data] alicesmith
Line 1: Line 1:
-===== Case Success =====+This is a [[event:2013-09|LegalHack@OKCon 2013]] challenge
  
-This is a [[event:2013-09|LegalHack@OKCon 2013]] challenge.+====== Case Success ======
  
 Every case is unique. Every case is unique.
Line 7: Line 7:
 It is often difficult for a lawyer to answer one of the most pressing question of his client: What are my chances of success if we go to court (or if I plea non-guilty)? The challenge is to provide lawyers and clients with an accurate //base rate// of success or //average amount// for a similar claim. At the end of the day, the decision is always taken by a judge on the basis of the evidence and arguments in front of him. However, when you have a database of thousands of these decisions, you can start seeing trends and probablities. It is often difficult for a lawyer to answer one of the most pressing question of his client: What are my chances of success if we go to court (or if I plea non-guilty)? The challenge is to provide lawyers and clients with an accurate //base rate// of success or //average amount// for a similar claim. At the end of the day, the decision is always taken by a judge on the basis of the evidence and arguments in front of him. However, when you have a database of thousands of these decisions, you can start seeing trends and probablities.
  
-Reference links and data sources:+Law case databases like [[http://www.canlii.org/en/|CanLii from Canada]] (also see [[http://beta.canlii.org/fr/international.html|Beta Site]]) offer exhaustive decisions from a certain court for a certain period of times. What kind of metadata would allow easily to compile such statistics?
  
-  * Law case databases like [[http://www.canlii.org/en/|CanLii from Canada]] (also see [[http://beta.canlii.org/fr/international.html|Beta Site]]) offer exhaustive decisions from a certain court for a certain period of times. What kind of metadata would allow easily to compile such statistics?+Example use cases:
  
-Examples:+  * **Criminal law:** What is the success rate of a //right to self-defense// strategy in case of assault? What is the average sentence? How many cases go to appeal? 
 +  * **Civil law:** What is the base rate of success for a (//dommage-intérêts//) claim in case of property damages caused by a dog? In case of success, what is the average amount of damages granted by the judge? 
 +  * **Building trust:** clients of lawyers could take more well-advised decisions when it comes to "should we try to settle out of court or not" (for civil law cases).  
 +  * **Research**: it can be extremely valuable for policy-makers and researchers to have the ability to easily cross reference a large amount of case data.
  
-  - Criminal law: What is the success rate of a ""right to self-defense"" defense in case of assault? What is the average sentence? ... How many cases go to appeal? +=== Hackathon goals ===
-  - Civil law: What is the base rate of success for a criminal damage (//dommage-intérêts//) claim in case of property damages caused by a dog? In case of success, what is the average amount of criminal damage granted by the judge? +
-  - This information could help build trust between lawyers and clients; Clients could also take more well-advised decisions when it comes to "should we try to settle out of court or not" (for civil law cases). Also, it can be extremely valuable for policy-makers and researchers.+
  
-Suggested goals:+  - Create a database with parties names, status (plaintiff or defendant) and the result (who won the case); 
 +  - Push the database forward by including the amount of the claim and the result; 
 +  - Create a website where the user can query his chances of success;
  
-  - What is the success rate of a "right to self-defense" defense in case of assault? (in front of a specific court, for a specific territorial jurisdiction) +We could start with these three goals regarding one specific legal action (example: civil liability claims for damages caused by an animal) in front of a specific jurisdiction (example: Cour du Québec). If the goals are too easy, the ultimate goal would be to extend to multiple legal actions or multiple jurisdictions.
-  - Identify metadata that could allow to seek this kind of information easily. Identify metadata that could allow a more granular research.  +
-  - Scale the Hackday goal 1 solution to another jurisdiction.+
  
 ====== Project ===== ====== Project =====
Line 29: Line 30:
 Brief description of your hackday results goes here. Add sections below if you need more room. Brief description of your hackday results goes here. Add sections below if you need more room.
  
-Include links to your demo and/or source code.+Include links to your demo and/or [[http://debtpro.co/debt-relief-scams-tips-to-avoid-protect/|source]] code.
  
 ===== Data ===== ===== Data =====
  • project/legal/casesuccess.1378482051.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2013/09/06 17:40
  • by loleg