Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
project:legal:productliability [2013/08/27 02:04] – [Project description] alog | project:legal:productliability [2018/11/13 15:34] (current) – [Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD)] alicesmith | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD) ===== | + | This is a [[event: |
- | ==== Project description | + | ====== Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD) ====== |
- | This project, started by the [[event: | + | This project aims to build a Linked Data repository containing information about regimes in product |
- | ==== Possible implementation steps ==== | + | |
- | * An existing standard legal ontology has to be found and and extended with the needed concepts in order to be able to model the different legal theories used to establish a link between plaintiff and defendant. | + | === Hackathon goals === |
- | * (optional): a vizualisation could be done to offer a didactic overview of what product liability is | + | |
- | * A triple store is set. Starting from the defined ontology, the triple store is then populated with information about different applicable legal product liability theories. This is done by venue (country, state or province) and other criteria (e.g. type of product). | + | |
- | * A simple RESTfull API can be defined on top of the SPARQL-Endpoint to querry information about product liability. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Extra goal ==== | + | |
- | Determine anticipated changes | + | It is a proof of concept. We would like to investigate and define a systematic approach to collect the data, if possible in an automatic way. |
- | ==== Examples of results ==== | + | === Some possible practical steps === |
- | | + | |
- | | + | - The ontology is then extended with the needed concepts |
+ | | ||
+ | - A [[http:// | ||
+ | - Starting from the defined ontology, the triple store is then populated with information about different applicable legal product liability theories. This is done by venue (country, state or province) and other criteria (e.g. type of product) and could look like this: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Jurisdiction | ||
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | North Carolina | ||
+ | | ... | ... | .... | ... | ... | ... | | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Bonus points: determine anticipated changes to applicable legal theories | ||
==== Data sources ==== | ==== Data sources ==== | ||
Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
* http:// | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | |||
| | ||
{{tag> | {{tag> |