Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
project:legal:productliability [2013/08/27 02:01] – alog | project:legal:productliability [2018/11/13 15:34] (current) – [Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD)] alicesmith | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD) ===== | + | This is a [[event: |
- | ==== Project description | + | ====== Linked Product Liability Data (LPLD) ====== |
- | This is project | + | This project aims to build a Linked Data repository |
- | ==== Possible implementation steps ==== | + | === Hackathon goals === |
- | * An existing standard legal ontology has to be found and and extended with the needed concepts in order to be able to model the different legal theories used to establish | + | It is a proof of concept. We would like to investigate |
- | * (optional): a vizualisation could be done to offer a didactic overview of what product liability is | + | |
- | * A triple store is set. Starting from the defined ontology, the triple store is then populated with information about different applicable legal product liability theories. This is done by venue (country, state or province) and other criteria (e.g. type of product). | + | |
- | * A simple RESTfull API can be defined on top of the SPARQL-Endpoint to querry information about product liability. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ==== Extra goal ==== | + | |
- | Determine anticipated changes to applicable legal theories | + | === Some possible practical steps === |
- | ==== Examples | + | - An existing standard legal ontology has to be found |
+ | - The ontology is then extended with the needed concepts in order to be able to model the different legal theories used to establish a link between plaintiff and defendant. | ||
+ | - (optional): a vizualisation could be done to offer a didactic overview | ||
+ | - A [[http:// | ||
+ | - Starting from the defined ontology, the triple store is then populated with information about different applicable legal product liability theories. This is done by venue (country, state or province) and other criteria (e.g. type of product) and could look like this: | ||
- | | + | ^ Jurisdiction |
- | | + | | Germany |
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | Germany | ||
+ | | North Carolina | ||
+ | | ... | ... | .... | ... | ... | ... | | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Bonus points: determine anticipated changes to applicable legal theories | ||
==== Data sources ==== | ==== Data sources ==== | ||
Line 32: | Line 37: | ||
* http:// | * http:// | ||
+ | * http:// | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | |||
| | ||
{{tag> | {{tag> |