Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- project:discoverabilitythroughstructure [2015/06/05 17:46] – eth-bibliothek
+++ project:discoverabilitythroughstructure [2019/02/03 21:17] (current) – old revision restored (2015/06/06 13:39) loleg
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
-Use case
+**Use case**
-Goal: A user wants to find data that combine election results with demographic characteristics (age, nationality etc., areas).
-User workflow without the meta portal: The user searches different portals with different interfaces in order to find the information he wants. Hence he has to enter the same query several times. After having found the necessary data, the user has to combine/visualize the data himself using a separate applicatio
+**Goal:** A user wants to find data that combine election results with demographic characteristics (age, nationality etc., areas).
+**User workflow without the meta portal:** The user searches different portals with different interfaces in order to find the information he wants. Hence he has to enter the same query several times. After having found the necessary data, the user has to combine/visualize the data himself using a separate applicatio
 Disadvantages: Searching takes a lot of time or the necessary data cannot be found although the data would actually be available.
-User workflow using the meta portal: The user only searches in one portal with one interface. The system helps the user to find the data by providing filters, suggestions, culstering, maps. He might find data from repositories that he otherwise wouldn't have searched.
+**User workflow using the meta portal:** The user only searches in one portal with one interface. The system helps the user to find the data by providing filters, suggestions, culstering, maps. He might find data from repositories that he otherwise wouldn't have searched.
-Specific user workflow:
+**Specific user workflow:**
   - The user enters the keywords //zurich elections//
   - The system suggests search terms/displays boxes using disambiguation (e.g.: zurich in switzerland city, zurich in switzerland canton).
@@ Line 44: / Line 45: @@
   - The user has the possibility to directly combine and visualize the actual data within the portal itself.
-Datasets to experiment with:
+**Datasets to experiment with:**
   - http://data.stadt-zuerich.ch/ogd.FUf4u5s.link
@@ Line 63: / Line 64: @@
 GeoNames may be a good source of geographical ontology data.
+===== Mockups: Global open data search portal =====
+{{:project:search_elections.png?200|}}
+{{:project:search_demographics.png?200|}}
+{{:project:analytics.png?200|}}
+Mockups created using [[balsamiq | https://balsamiq.com/]]
+===== Prototype: Global open data search portal =====
+[[https://sleepy-sea-1327.herokuapp.com|demo]], [[https://github.com/bellisk/opendata-multisearch|source code]]
+Future Work:
+   * Sorting by title, pub date, relevant date
+   * Searching by relevant date (date/date range the information is about)
+   * Example of a facet widget that is enabled for certain searches, eg Volksinitiativen have data sets by different areas like Canton, Municipality, etc.
 ===== Team =====
@@ Line 80: / Line 98: @@
   * [[http://docs.ckan.org/en/latest/api/index.html]]
-{{tag>status:concept needs:design}}
+{{tag>status:concept needs:design research}}